10 Feb 2021
Posted in Power
India looks to promote domestic solar manufacturing, but industry needs structural changes, says GlobalData
The tender invitation for the development of 5GW grid connected solar power projects under the Central Public Sector Undertaking (CPSU) Scheme Phase II in India is a great push designed to promote domestic solar panels manufacturing, but it has come at a time when the domestic solar energy equipment (mainly modules) manufacturers are finding it difficult to sustain due to the influx of cheaper imported modules, according to GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.
Tarun Bhutani, Project Manager of Power at GlobalData, comments: “Domestic solar manufacturing industry needs expansion and fresh capital investments to cater to the capacity addition under the scheme, but large-scale investments are risky as CPSU scheme is the only guaranteed demand source. The demand for domestic modules will be limited as utility-scale developers are expected to continue to prefer cheaper and technologically advanced imported modules.”
The CPSU Scheme, which is also known as Government Producer Scheme, is aimed at setting up 12GW grid-connected solar PV power projects by government producers for self-use or for government entities either directly or through electricity distribution companies. This capacity is to be added by financial year 2022-23.
The bidding process is under Domestic Content Requirement (DCR) category, which mandates the use of solar photovoltaic cells and modules manufactured domestically. Viability Gap Funding (VGF) is provided under the scheme to cover the cost difference between the domestically produced and imported solar cells and modules.
Mr Bhutani concludes: “The structural factors such as the need of fresh capital investments, technologically obsolete production lines and the CPSU scheme being the sole source of demand, create a landscape which ultimately limits the scheme from reaching its true potential and can only be considered as a short term measure to promote domestic manufacturing.
“Structural support is needed in the form of interest-cost subvention, provision for low-cost land and power, central financial assistance for setting up and upgrading capacity production, backward integration enablers and fund to upgrade technology among others. Facilitating these will help improve the competitiveness of domestic manufacturers to compete with global giants, which have large installed manufacturing bases, presence across the value chain and are more cost-efficient.”